The Bullroarer - Friday 19th September 2008

NZ Herald - There's oil in them sewage ponds

One man's waste is another man's treasure in a process developed in New Zealand that could revolutionise the fuel industry.

A South Island company has developed a means of turning algae that grow in sewage ponds into crude oil, which can then be refined into fuels such as petrol, LPG or kerosene and aviation fuel.

ABC - Rudd unveils $100m clean coal plan

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has announced a new body which will act as a global centre to drive clean coal technologies in Australia and worldwide.

The Government will spend $100 million on establishing the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute, which Mr Rudd says will coordinate funding and research for new projects.

National Business Review NZ - Meridian Energy teams up with Waikato wind project

Meridian Energy has become a partner in Waikato electricity distribution company WEL Networks' proposed $200 million 28-turbine wind park east of Raglan.

WEL has gained resource consent for the project on the Wharauroa Plateau, near Te Uku, 7km from Raglan on the west coast.

Stuff.co.nz - Isabella goes ape over palm oil products

Isabella campaigned against palm oil because of its toll on the orangutan's natural jungle habitat.

SMH - Solar power couple find rays of sunshine

''In the last three years, with the cost of diesel [rising], solar power systems have very much grown as an option for stations,'' says Brenda Slate, who manages the administrative side of the business.

''With the trade environment and with where renewable energy is going, we've decided to focus on that whole side of the business.''

The Age - Energy giants put Qld coal seam on map

A scramble by global energy companies for a foothold in Queensland's coal seam methane (CSM) sector has elevated the industry from relative obscurity to the forefront of the energy spectrum.

Once the poor cousin in the power mix, the budding CSM sector has emerged as a potential rival to the massive North West Shelf in Western Australia as an energy source for power hungry Asia.

Radio NZ - Hawaiian Airlines to modify Boeing 767s to improve fuel efficiency

Hawaiian Airlines is planning to alter the wingtips of eight B-767 jets in order to reduce fuel costs

Stuff.co.nz - Wind farm gets big backer

A multi-million dollar deal between Wel Networks and Meridian Energy is likely to fast-track a proposed 28-turbine wind farm at Te Uku.

Stuff.co.nz - New fleet may mean US covets Brazil's oil - Lula

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva warned that the resurrection of a US naval fleet in Latin America may signal that Washington covets huge new oil reserves off Brazil's coast.

The US Navy is re-establishing the US Fourth Fleet, which was decommissioned 58 years ago, to combat drug trafficking, provide disaster relief and help with peacekeeping missions in Latin America and the Caribbean.

But the return of the fleet has been met with widespread scepticism in Brazil and elsewhere in the region, where many see a US military presence as a threat to sovereignty.

The Australian - Air NZ cuts emissions significantly

AIR New Zealand has once again raised the environmental bar for the airline industry after completing what was dubbed "one prefect flight" from Auckland to San Francisco last Friday

The flight -- NZ8 -- in a world first, used optimised procedures and flight routings to cut fuel burn and emission significantly.

The Age - Straits Resources cancels coal de-merger

Copper and gold miner Straits Resources Ltd will not proceed with a planned de-merger of its subsidiary Straits Asia Resources Ltd due to current market volatility.

The Straits Resources board has decided it is inappropriate to proceed with the restructure in light of present market conditions, the company said on Thursday.

Straits Resources had planned to de-merge its 47 per cent held subsidiary, coal miner Straits Asia Resources Ltd, by mid-October, leaving the parent entity to focus on metals production.

The Australian - Life in suburbs drives emissions higher

WORKING families living on the edges of Australia's urban sprawl are generating up to 10 times more greenhouse emissions in their cars than those from the inner city, according to new research.

The study by Parsons Brinkerhoff and Curtin University shows the same outer suburbs that put Kevin Rudd into power are increasingly expensive to build and service, driving worseningeconomic, environmental and social costs.

With transport accounting for around half of an average Australian household's greenhouse footprint, inner city residents could be generating just half the emissions of those living out in the mortgage belt.

The Rudd Government has already flagged it will forgo $1 billion a year in revenue by cutting the fuel excise to compensate motorists for the higher prices resulting from its proposed emissions trading scheme from 2010.

ABC - Emissions targets: 'Billions needed' to upgrade power lines

Queensland electricity transmitters say they will have to spend billions updating infrastructure to meet lower carbon emission standards.

Proactive Investors - Paladin Energy increases stake in Deep Yellow

Speculation about the future of Deep Yellow Limited (ASX: DYL) was rife today after Paladin Energy (TSX & ASX: PDN) announced that it had upped its stake in the company to 19.29% from 15.3%.

Paladin Energy stated that it considered the investment strategic and that it “looked forward to continuing to be a supportive shareholder”.

ABC - Govt awards 45yr gas pipe licence

The Queensland Government has awarded a company a 45 year licence for a major gas pipeline in central Queensland.

Arrow Energy wants to extract coal seam gas from Moranbah and build a pipeline to a liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant it plans to build at Gladstone.

"Rudd unveils $100 million clean coal plan". No surprise.It has been obvious for some time that this Claytons government(the Howard gov. you have when etc)is well and truly in the pocket of big business.This is also illustrated by Gillard's proposed industrial laws.

I wonder what $100 million would buy in renewable energy generation.

I think a continuation of the economic meltdown is about the only hope we have.That will cripple big business and take their government suckholes along with them.

Pity about the collateral damage.

'Queensland electricity transmitters say they will have to spend billions updating infrastructure to meet lower carbon emission standards.'

If this is the case, would not it be better to spend nothing on the current infrastructure and pour this billions into renewable energy sources?

In this case, the point is that to add new low carbon energy sources to the grid you need to build more transmission lines - this is true and applies pretty much everywhere.

The main problem is that they are concentrating on replacing (or supplementing) existing coal fired power with coal seam methane (gas fired) power and building new transmission capacity out to the Surat basin - instead of focusing on solar (CSP), wind and biogas.

I go through peaks (pardon the pun) and troughs in my concerns over our future as a result of PO/CC.
With everything that is happening on the financial front, and the sheer magnitude of the problems facing us combined with the lack of a clue most people have, I am feeling rather doomerish at the moment.

Better get to work on the vegie garden.

Well - if its any comfort, I've found that after 4 odd years of doing this I never feel doomerish - I just can't see any value in doing so.

Working on the vegie garden is a good thing to do regardless - I planted my first lot of carrots, onions and leeks yesterday, as part of experiment to see if I can actually grow edible produce.

On the grid transmission topic, Grist has a good summary of the issues involved :

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/9/15/174745/442?source=daily

Apart from the technical challenges of separating CO2 out from the gas emission stream; and "sequestering" it underground securely, the fact is that "clean coal" technology will cost between 15% and 40% of the power produced by the plant. This will imply the construction of new electricity generation plants, reducing coal exports and/or increasing our coal mining capacity. The overall investment will be huge, if only just to maintain capacity. If one factors in economic growth as well, even more money must be spent.

Clean coal is a useful red herring - for a mere $100m he can avoid having to do anything at all. His only objective is to win the 2010 election; and the Turnbull led Coalition has him really rattled.

Tim Flannery has resigned himself to leaping into bed with "Clean Coal"...

A very thought-provoking essay in Saturday's SMH
http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/the-coal-conundrum/2008/09/19/122...

Do not assume from any of this that I believe clean coal technologies to be safe or cost-effective. In some circumstances they may prove to be as dangerous as nuclear power and as expensive as solar panels. My point is that the world, and China in particular, has gone so far down the road of using coal as an energy source that we have little choice but to pursue a solution that involves it.

Flannery has been a bit of a loose cannon for sometime.I have a lot of respect for him as a scientist but he has been making some statements lately which don't fit with his previous positions.
Nothing wrong with changing your mind of course as long as the change is for the better.

I'm not sure how reliable the reporting is in this SMH article.The MSM,as always,has to be put through a "slant filter" to arrive at even an approximation of the truth.

In any case,on Wednesday I will be attending a lecture by Flannery at the Brisbane City Hall.It will be interesting to hear what he has to say,especially under fire from some of our local greenies.I hope Ian Lowe is there.

The Tim Flannery SMH article makes other important points, namely that even IF clean coal works its not going to be possible to replace all existing coal fired plants and the cost may make coal too expensive anyway.
In Australia the Rudd government has committed to 20% renewable energy by 2020, and there is no way more than one CCS demonstration plant will be build and running before that date, and if some new coal plants can use CCS it's still likely that most new electricity will have to come from NG or renewable energy. Once NG prices increase to reflect world prices, wind, solar and geothermal are going to look like good investments.