Infrastructure Australia - Call for Submissions

If you want your say on the kind of major infrastructure projects we need to build ourselves out of (rather than into) a post peak oil mess, here is your chance:



Federal Infrastructure and Transport Minister Anthony Albanese and Infrastructure Australia Chair Sir Rod Eddington have urged all Australians to be part of the Rudd Labor Government's nation-building agenda.

Until 15 October, any member of the public and business community can submit their project ideas to Infrastructure Australia for evaluation and possible inclusion on the National Infrastructure Priority List - the first of which will be handed to the Council of Australian Governments in March 2009.

"We want both industry and the community to be our partners in the long term effort to fix and modernise the nation's critical economic infrastructure: our roads; railways; ports; water and energy utilities; and telecommunications," said Mr Albanese.

"I urge the community to take this opportunity to have their say. After all, the quality of the nation's infrastructure affects the bottom line of all businesses and the quality of life of all citizens.

"But in making a submission we are asking people to look beyond their own street or neighbourhood and to put forward ideas and suggestions that will strengthen the national economy.

"We as a government do not believe that we have a monopoly on all the good ideas for Australia's future."

Sir Rod Eddington said one of the goals of Infrastructure Australia is to facilitate public discussion of how the nation can better plan, finance, build and use major infrastructure.

"We have indications that members of the community, including people working in industry and government, have both ideas and information potentially of great value to our work," said Sir Rod Eddington.

"Continuing investment by both the public and private sectors must be based on a sound understanding of strategic national priorities including economic, social, and environmental considerations.

"With this in mind, I will tomorrow release a discussion paper to stimulate both public and private conversations about the challenges and opportunities ahead."

Infrastructure Australia's immediate tasks are to conduct an audit of the nation's transport, energy, communications and water infrastructure; produce an Infrastructure Priority List to guide future public and private investment decisions; and develop nationally consistent guidelines for Public Private Partnerships.

Infrastructure Australia is also in a position to provide advice on the harmonisation of policies and regulations relating to investment in and use of nationally significant infrastructure.

The discussion paper calls for evidence-based submissions to inform each of these tasks. Submissions should be no more than 15 pages and sent to mail@infrastructureaustralia.gov.au with "Submission" in the subject field.

Although email is preferred, submissions may be lodged via post and should be addressed to:

The Infrastructure Coordinator
Infrastructure Australia
GPO Box 594
CANBERRA 2601

Infrastructure Australia is an independent statutory advisory council with twelve members drawn from industry and all levels of government, including five from the private sector.

The discussion paper and information about how to prepare and lodge a submission is available at: www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au.

What are you waiting for?

Although it's easy to be cynical, contributing well written and persuasive submissions is very important. If you don't submit your thoughts to these processes, you can't complain later.

Feel free to brainstorm in the comments below..

and I think Neil Howes (and others) should be submitting their bid for a 1000km HVDC line to connect the South Australian electricity grid to the Queensland grid. That would open up a vast swathe of central Australia for Concentrating Solar Polar and perhaps also some geothermal.

With a feed-in-tariff and the grid in place, our renewable energy future will just about build itself. Seriously.

Check out Neil's post: A National Electricity Grid For Australia

I second that call - ideally we'd see a lot of submissions all proposing similar things - and opening up central Australia to the grid is a key element.

For me it has been not so easy to be cynical.It has taken the best part of 60 years to achieve even a partial state.Then,I'm a slow learner.

But I will put in a submission.Where there's life there's hope.

Rail infrastructure would have to be at the top of my list with duplication and electrification of the main southern line, building of the inland rail between Melbourne and Brisbane, establsihing coridors for high speed long distance trains to replace the current airline industry.

Standard gauge inland rail link from Melbourne to Gladstone would be a nice start.

Then the HVDC Brisbane to South Australia link. Anyone heard of the progress of the Isalink proposal?

How about the east coast maglev (Cairns down to Melbourne via Brisbane, Sydney Canberra and the Snowies) with legs off to Adelaide and Perth?

We could replace the bulk of airline traffic (they're all going broke anyway, so we might as well push them out of that business and get the airlines to buy into the maglev project instead). We could flit off down to the snow in winter in an hour. We could solve the property affordability crisis by having dormitory suburbs 200km away from the capital cities. We could still have our tourism industry intact. We could keep up business-as-usual with day trips to other capital cities and not have to worry about fuel prices or greenhouse gas emissions.

It probably only requires around 11,000km of track. At around $AUD40m per km (if it's possible to match the prices Shanghai paid)... so it should only cost a mere $AUD440b.

Approximately 2/3 of GDP.

Hmm.

Oh well.

Still... the Kalgoolie water pump line (a 500km fresh water pipe build around 1900) cost more than the entire GDP of the colonies at the time. We wouldn't have a mining industry now (still) in that part of Western Australia without it, so I guess it paid itself off.

Its often hard to estimate the real value of infrastructure projects.

Your Kalgoorlie pipeline project is a great example - you'd probably never pay for it by charging people who use the water, but the industries enabled by it have probably paid back the cost many times over in terms of the extra tax revenue generated for the state and federal govts - so a "true" accounting would show its a worthwhile investment.