![]() | The Bakken Formation: How Much Will It Help? | The Oil Drum | Who is MOST to blame for the closure of the Forties Pipeline? | ![]() |
![]() | The Bullroarer - Saturday 26 April 2008 | TOD: Australia/New Zealand | Getting about green: Sydney's future after the oil age | ![]() |
80 comments on If you think the oil situation is bad..
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
80 comments on If you think the oil situation is bad..
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
User login
Contact
- anz at theoildrum dot com
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
This article is quite well balanced in its views, and pulls no punches when it comes to stating that future demand for oil will exceed supply siting fundamental population and energy needs issues. However the following comment is typical of the mainstream media in how it will initially and quite fairly reference oil price and supply issues but then revert back to how 'peak oil' is a load of hogwash (given proven reserves), used by some backward group of people infering their not to be listened to, This is a classic example...
"A small band of sceptics view today's record prices as evidence that oil supplies have peaked — that half the globe's supply has already been used up. But most experts believe there are still enough reserves, discovered and undiscovered, to last at least through the middle of the century."
Ofcourse, there are significant proven reserves, but the author fails to clearly articulate Peak Oil as a natural geological phenomenon which is understood by an inability for the production capacity of future oil resources to adequately make up for the shortfall of the existing declining oil supply on a world scale. It's introduction is not required for readers here. Again, if proven reserves are harder to reach, more energy and investment is required before oil can flow and diminishing returns on investment result. When you add the other issues mentioned in the article such as resource nationalism, increasing population, the high rate of growth of China, India and the Middle East etc, then you get a potent cocktail of factors weighing against the 'business as usual' approach. Peak oil will just put all the above factors right smack bang in our faces, as economic conditions deteriorate as a consequence.
As always, conservation will be up front and centre of any strategy to mitigate the effects of peak oil, both for business and for individuals. At least this article begins to approach some of the more fundamental problems in the oil market. However, demonising Peak Oil will not do anyone any favours. It is possible that the mainstream media will never truly grasp the concept of Peak Oil and continue to lay blame with whatever event or series of events has led to the latest price shock. The unfortunate thing about that is, it keeps people from standing back and seeing the issue with perspective where people may gain an extra insight into the broad conditions which have set the current events in motion. An understanding of Peak Oil will, hopefully, provide and lead to three key understandings.. No.1 is a realisation that economic growth is dependent on cheap and available energy. No.2 is that conservation is needed from here on in - and that its not just until the oil price drops. And No.3 is that relocalisation and permaculture actually do allow for meaningful solutions and that, hey, you may actually get to work in partnership growing food with your neighbours - and perhaps you can handle their singing in the shower after all.
Great line philgene, with that definition of Peak oil. "An inability for the production capacity of future oil resources to adequately make up for the shortfall of the existing declining oil supply on a world scale."
That's the best, most concise defintion I've read so far. Maybe if I force my wife to read it enough times it will sink into her overly optimistic viewpoint. The other day she said the price of oil was due to speculators, then it was we will avert any problems by switching to hybrid vehicles. I couldn't bring myself to explain why that won't solve peak oil. I've just run out of steam to convert her to a peak oiler. Instead I'm going to just act as an observer, almost like a naturalist in the Serengeti observing animal behavior, to delight when that light in her head finally blinks on with clear recognition.
I agree, but it has one problem: the Avg. Joe can't maintain enough interest to parse a sentence that complex and, so, will not get the message. This is a problem we face in educating others. We need a simple way to make a clear point.
The problem of Peak Oil is not because "oil" is almost gone. Go outside and look at the road in front of your house. That black stuff? That's what passes for "oil" these days. Picture the old oil gushers. Now picture the road. Gusher. Road. How much more work and energy do you think it takes to turn tar into oil? How fast could you do it? That's much of the half of oil that's left. And that's why Peak Oil isn't about how much "oil" there is. It's about how fast we can get it out of the ground vs. how fast we are using it.
Hmmm... that needs some paring down...
The problem of Peak Oil isn't that "oil" is almost gone. Go outside and look at the road in front of your house. That black stuff? That's what passes for "oil" these days. Picture the old oil gushers. Now picture the road. Gusher. Road. That's the half of oil that's left. And that's why Peak Oil isn't about how much "oil" there is, it's about how fast we can get it out of the ground vs. how fast we are using it. And it's coming out the ground more slowly all the time.
Or...
Peak Oil: we're using it faster than we can get it out of the ground, and we're getting less and less each year.
Or whatever.... anyone else got something short, sweet and understandable to the uninitiated without too much thought?
Average Joe: Yeah but thats just the greedy oil companys holding it back to push the price up in't it! (Usually delivered as a statement of fact)
Peak oiler: Um welll aaargh no not really....
Joe: There's plenty of oil they just want to rip us off. And the governemetn too . Look how much tax on petrol there is.
Peak Guy: Oil is actaully still pretty cheap considering the work it does
Joe: Cheap! (spluttering) How can call it cheap? It costs nearly a hundred bucks just fill the wifes Commodore. And the ute and the boat cost nearly two hundred just to go fisshing for a weekend. JUST FOR FISHING. How can can you call it cheap?
And so on and so forth.....
(feel free to add to the converstation)
Don't forget, "Yes there are problems, but as the price rises we'll develop new technologies and it'll all be alright."
I've had people tell me in all seriousness that since Titan has hydrocarbon seas... :)
Discussing prices years ago with my dad (an oil patch veteran):
He understood depletion (like in his own wells) BUT NOT PEAK. What he understood was:
"obviously the Chinese are willing to outbid us on what's left".
Suddenly there was no more discussion as the light went on. I mean, I know that's unfair and all, but I think it's not worth trying to make people understand PO per se..