The Bullroarer - Tuesday 11 March 2008

Victoria: the garden state or greenhouse capital?

MELBOURNE produces far more greenhouse emissions from transport than London despite having half the population, according to a new study.

Highlighting the heavy environmental cost of Melbourne's urban sprawl, the study found the city's cars, trucks, motorcyles and public transport services were generating the equivalent of 11 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, compared with just 8.5 million tonnes in London.

And so the State Government came out defending their transport policies:
Government committed to low emission transport

The Victorian Government has defended the level of greenhouse gas emissions caused by transport in Melbourne.

Homeowners get incentive to go solar

Queensland homes using solar power will be paid more for the excess energy they generate for the electricity grid.

Under the state government's Solar Bonus Scheme, the "feed-in tariff" for solar powered homes will be boosted to 44 cents per kilowatt hour.

Oil strike could triple NZ GDP

New Zealand could potentially triple its GDP in the event of a big oil strike, according to bullish investors at the Crown Minerals' Petroleum conference yesterday.

Earlier in the day associate energy minister Harry Duynhoven told delegates that the petroleum industry had an important contribution to make to the country, and was a “good news story” with two major fields in production and two more to come online within the next year or so.

Greens promise free public transport for kids

Public transport would be free for all Brisbane children within three years under a plan outlined by Greens mayoral candidate Jo Bragg today.

Ms Bragg said the "kids ride free" initiative would be phased in during the next three years and begin with off-peak travel until there were enough buses and ferries to extend the offer to peak periods.

Gas the energy solution: industry

Policy and fiscal reforms are needed to bring large natural gas projects off the drawing board and into reality, says the upstream natural gas sector's peak industry association.

"And we need to give gas a level playing field as a fuel for domestic power generation," Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) chief executive Belinda Robinson said in a statement on Tuesday.

How many more times are we going to see this useless pandering by the likes of the NRMA and RACV?

Tell motorists 'fair' petrol price: NRMA

A national scheme should be set up to let motorists know if they are being ripped off at the petrol pump, says Australia's peak motoring body.

NRMA president Alan Evans launched the NSW-based group's "price gap" scheme, which he said calculated a fair price for a litre of petrol in Sydney.

Phil: The Australian Institute of Petroleum lays out their case pretty convincingly in their Facts about Petrol Pricing document on their website. The correlation between Singapore product prices and Australian retail prices is remarkable! Pretty hard to find any price manipulation in there.

Oil companies make a lot of money extracting oil at >$100/barrel, but the crude price trend is simply what is required to ration a product that they can't increase supply of. Retailing is a low margin business with profits coming from the sales of 'in store' goodies and supermarket groceries.

Having the NRMA continue flogging this dead horse is not doing anybody any good.

Flogging the dead horse has two possible side effects:

1. (Good) People become cranky about their dependence on oil and become more motivated to seek out alternatives or become more efficient in their petrol usage.
2. (Bad) People become motivated to agitate for reductions in petrol taxes.

I like the free bus rides for kids idea in Brisbane.

That NZ headline is stupid. Why not "Big oil find could increase NZ GDP by factor of 20" - its no less unrealistic.

Victoria has a lot of emissions because 81% of the trips we take are by car, and on average only 0.59 people per trip besides the driver.

We drive cars because we have heaps of roads, and the public transport is pretty ordinary.

The trains are good to ride on, but have frequent delays and cancellations during peak hours - when it's important to get where you're going on time. They're also quite infrequent outside peak times on many lines. They don't extend to the new suburbs.

The trams are comfortable to ride on, but slow because they rarely have right of way, idiot car drivers get in their way, and they don't cover all suburbs.

The buses are just shit, slow and infrequent, with 30-60 minutes between buses outside peak times, and many bus stops without timetables, so you don't even know how long you'll have to wait.

There is no authority to co-ordinate the three services, so while the actual travel time on train and bus might be (say) 20 minutes and 15 minutes, with the waits between it might be an hour all up. The services are poorly connected, so that to travel to an adjoining suburb you might have to take the train into the city, then back out again on another line, taking an hour to do what could be a journey of 20 minutes direct.

There are few cycle lanes about, and cyclists are treated by drivers as obstacles rather than fellow travellers, so that cycling is taking your life in your hands.

Walking remains an excellent option for most of Melbourne, but house prices mean that people tend to live some distance from work, further than can be walked. But trips to shops and the like, those are walkable, and here it's just laziness that stops it.

Thus, cars are in general more convenient than public transport in terms of travel time and reliability. They're less convenient in other ways, such as cost and safety, but people don't think of those day-to-day, those are long-term things. Thus, 81% of trips taken are by car, and thus our enormous emissions.

The State Government is lazy and stupid. The Transport Minister Kosky said when asked if privatisation would be reversed, "I don't want to run a public transport system." Someone who doesn't want to run a public transport system should not be a minister for transport. It's like having a Treasurer who doesn't want to run the tax system.

Higher fuel prices have thus far helped bring about a big rise in the use of public transport, despite the incompetence of the PT companies. They've reacted to overcrowding by an advertising campaign telling passengers to be polite to one another.

It's rather as if I had a restaurant, and when customers were lining up to get in, instead of putting more tables out, I hand out little brochures telling them to be patient and nice to each-other while waiting in line. If you get increased custom, you increase your services - this works in any other business, why public transport is thought to be different I don't know.

Kiashu for transport minister !

Of course I agree!

I had to search hard to find the text of the Constitution of Victoria, which as it's an Act of the Victorian Parliament and most of its provisions require no referendum to change, is absurdly lengthy for a constitution, at 182 pages; they spend about 12 pages just talking about the Governor's pension.

Anyway, I found a good bit,

A responsible Minister of the Crown shall not hold office for a longer period than three months unless he is or becomes a member of the Council or the Assembly.[...]

So I can be appointed Minister of Transport, but only for three months. But what a three months it'd be! :D